Methods: Data analysis of the responses to the ASCQ was conducted for three models using confirmatory factor analysis with full-information maximum likelihood parameter estimates. For both hypotheses, the independent variable is gender (nominal data) and the dependent variable is the effectiveness of autonomy-supportive coaching style (ordinal data). The authors suggest that a different set of dynamics may prevail when competitiveness is emphasized.ĭiscussion of Hypotheses: The hypotheses proposed for this research include the following: Hypothesis 1: Autonomy-supportive coaching style is more effective for female than male athletes in team sports and Hypothesis 2: Controlling coaching style is more effective for male than female athletes in team sports. Moreover, this study - and many others related to this research topic - are conducted during sports practice and not during actual competitions. The age range of the participants is wide, and calls to question whether different strategies might have different impact on the youth athletes depending on their age, as well as their gender.

Analysis of the relation between coaching styles and gender was not identified as an important variable in the initial approach to the study. Particularly of note is the absence of self-assessment by coaches of any differentiated treatment or interactions based on the gender or ages of the young athletes. Yet, the data was collected from the athletes, and apparently no data was collected from coaches with regard to their own perceptions or observations about their use of coaching strategies.

The intended audience is primarily individuals responsible for coach training programs. Psychology of Sport Exercise Conroy Capstone Project …

Download fitness word